Well there is no mincing words on this one.. ex-tesla owner myself ( MS 85d/100d) & prior to that a Porsche owner since age 16. Was looking forward to the Taycan as well and was going to give the car an minimum allowance of 220mi on a 100% SoC for the Taycan Turbo S trim line that I am on the books for at my dealer for the June 2020 build cycle.
I am hoping that Porsche will do something with the range by then. If not, I will forgo on the Turbo S Sedan and wait for the Cross Turismo. In the meantime I have reservations in addition to Taycan with Rivian R1T/R1S and on the waitlist for the Benz EQC/EQS, BMW i4/iNEXT & VW ID Space Vizzion/ID Buzz.
Either way.. Porsche fanboi here so there will be a Porsche in my Garage one way or another. I think Porsche owes us deposit holders a road map on its battery R&D for the Taycan so we have an understanding on where Porsche will take its battery tech & how that will translate to early adopters of the Taycan. I had an opportunity with my dealer to secure a allocation position for a Taycan Turbo 3weeks ago, I didnt take it due to EPA range info & a few other data points that were missing.
Overall, I agree with you that the range is a let down and not enough for my own needs. Price vs. Range benefit, regardless of the Porsche brand is just not feasible imo. So, I am gonna wait a bit longer and hope the lack of range will be sorted as an Audi e-tron 55 Quattro looks a lot better today than it did yesterday.